While some may find this comparison amusing, it is essential to analyze the impact of such feedback on the company's branding and image. The logo is a crucial element of a brand's identity, and a negative response to it can have lasting consequences.
In a quick survey, the author's wife and daughter preferred the old Audirvana Remote logo with the old "A" over the new logo, which they likened to a toilet bowl with a cover. Such feedback can be detrimental to a company's branding because it can affect how potential customers perceive the business.
To counteract this negative perception, the company may need to revisit its branding strategy and make changes accordingly. However, some may argue that such criticism is unjustified and merely subjective, and it is not uncommon for well-designed logos to be criticized by some people.
When it comes to SEO, incorporating keywords like "toilet bowl cover" may be a risky strategy for Audirvana. It is unlikely that users will be searching for software products by using such terms. Therefore, the company may need to focus on other keywords that relate to its product features and benefits.
In conclusion, the negative feedback about the Audirvana logo should not be ignored. It is essential to assess how customers perceive a brand's visual identity and make changes accordingly. At the same time, it is essential to note that criticism may be subjective, and a poorly received logo may not necessarily be a branding disaster. As for SEO, focusing on keywords that relate to the product's features and benefits may be more effective than using controversial terms like "toilet bowl cover.